History of SEO
Webmasters then began to optimize their sites in order to be ranked highly, leading to the emergence of white and black hate SEO. Well, what is SEO? Danny Sullivan, an industry analyst, believes that ‘search engine optimization’ first appeared in 1997. The first clear example of term’s use can was by Jon Audette and Multimedia Marketing Group. This can be seen on a webpage from February 1997. (A great SEO company is one that can actually prove their success, not just talk about them!)
Search algorithms, the formula that rank websites, originally did their work on the information provided by site owners, such as keyword meta tags. These tags show what the page is supposed to be about. The only problem with this method, however, was that site owners could put information in the tags that misrepresented what the site was actually about. Thus, pages would rank for random search terms, making search engines return inconsistent results. In addition, crafty webmasters also modified certain features in the HTML code of a website to help it rank better.
Since these engines depended on webmaster entered information, like keyword density, rampant abuse occurred. Thus, engines had to change their methods in order to return truly useful pages, not just pages stuffed with keywords. If a search engine provided bad results, users wouldn’t return, and it would lose market share. Thus, search engines began to create new, more complex algorithms that would rely on other factors that couldn’t easily be affected by webmasters.
Larry Page and Sergey Brin, students at Stanford, created a search engine called “backrub.” This engine used math to rank pages based on the number of links, or backlinks, pointed to the website, coming up with a number called “PageRank.” PageRank, theoretically, describes the chances that a user will reach a particular webpage through random wanderings around the internet. This means that certain links, those associated with high PageRank, are better than others.
In 1998, these two graduate students then created the company Google. Many users then flocked to Google, at first admiring its simplicity. The algorithm was balanced between the usual on-page indicators, like keywords, meta tags, site structure, etc.) and off-page indicators like inbound links and PageRank. This prevented webmasters from easily manipulating the rankings. However, this didn’t stop some webmasters from gaming the system, as they began exchanging, trading, buying, and selling links as much as possible. Some people created link farms, which are simply sites with huge numbers of links that are created to pass artificial PageRank.
Eventually, by 2004, many search engines took this manipulation into account, adding more indicators to help rank webpages. Google, for example, claims they rank pages based on 200 factors. The most popular search engines, such as Google and Yahoo, don’t tell anyone what their algorithms are, lest unscrupulous webmasters learn how to game the system. Many different search engine optimization experts, like Rand Fishkin, Aaron Wall, and Barry Schwaryz have studied search engine optimization and published their thoughts online. Some SEO people, in an effort to figure out what is SEO, have consulted the patents of these search engines.
Google, in 2005, started to personalize search engine results for individual users. This personalization depended on the searches that users had previously made. This went so far that it led Bruce Clay to say, in 2008, that ‘ranking is dead.’ He said this because he believed that personalized rankings would make a universal “ranking” impossible.
Google continued its campaign against gaming the system, beginning a war against paid links in 2007. In June 2009, Google added the ‘nofollow’ attribute to links, preventing certain links from passing PageRank. Matt Cutts explained that Google bots would treat followed links as valuable, but would otherwise totally ignore nofollow links. Thus nofollow links do not allow webmasters to game the system and accrue unmerited PageRank. However, this did not stop SEO practitioners, as they created certain Javascript code that would allow PageRank sculpting, along with other methods such as iframes and Flash.
In 2009, Google said that it would use the search history of Google users to help create and rank web pages in search results.
Later in 2009, instant or ‘real-time’ search was added to Google. This would allegedly make searches more relevant and timely. Social media sites make the internet change quickly; thus, search engines need to adapt. For a long time webmasters have carefully crafted and created their website over years to rank; now, fresh content ranks very quickly, and search algorithms have responded to this shift in web usage. Thus, fresh and unique content currently rules the landscape. Search Engine Optimization companies have grown over the years, but only the top 10% actually know how to influence the SERPS (Search Engine Result Pages).
Sister Fresh is an ecommerce site with a built-in Content Management System. Optimized for Search Engines as well.
http://www.sisterfresh.com/
1. https://affiliate-program.amazon.com/
2. LOGIN
3. left side bar shows “Signed in as”.. choose the proper account if you have more than one
4. go to aStore
5. hit “edit”
6. if new category, hit “Add Category Page”
7. Choose Category Title
8. hit “Add Products”
9. search for a product by keyword (ex. isopure protein) or (ex. isopure protein banana) to help focus search
10. hit “Add”
11. hit “back to catalog”
12. hit “continue”
13. hit “continue” until store is published!!
DONE
add product to category
1. https://affiliate-program.amazon.com/
2. LOGIN
3. left side bar shows “Signed in as”.. choose the proper account if you have more than one
4. go to aStore
5. hit “edit”
6. choose category (ex. Hair Products)
7. hit “Add Products”
LABOR RATES
Normal………………………………$12.50
If you wait…………………………..$15.00 per hour
If you watch………………………..$20.00 per hour
If you help………………………….$30.00 per hour
If you worked on it first………..$50.00 per hour
I have already talked about how to auto post WordPress to Facebook using the WordBook plug-in. The plug-in allows you to automatically post your latest WordPress blog post to your Facebook account. But what if you have a Facebook fan page and you want to keep your personal account separately? By using a Facebook application called NetworkedBlogs, you can automatically post your latest WordPress blog post to a Facebook fan page.
How to do an auto post from WordPress to Facebook fan page
- Add the NetworkedBlogs application on your Facebook account (you can do this by searching for “NetworkedBlogs” and then add the application through there).

- Follow the steps to add the application successfully to your account.
- After you add it in, go to the Application (through your Facebook profile’s sidebar) and find the “Register a Blog” button on the top of the NetworkedBlogs application.
- Fill your Blog Name, URL, and other details in.
- Follow the steps to successfully validate the blog and to confirm that you are the author of the blog.
- If everything is successful, you should be able to see your blog’s feed on the NetworkedBlogs application page

- Now, go to your Facebook fan page (mine is at http://www.facebook.com/CravingTech -be a fan if you haven’t!) and then click on the “Edit Page” on the left sidebar menu.
- You should see the NetworkedBlogs application in the list of other applications (assuming you’ve done all the steps correctly)

- Click on the “Edit” link (just below the NetworkedBlogs title).
- You should be able to see all the blogs that you’ve set-up from the previous steps, including your own:
Make sure you tick on the box under the column heading “Publish to Wall & Show on Tab“. - Save and just follow the last steps (granting permission, etc)
Congratulations, that was easy, wasn’t it? From now on, everytime you publish a post on your WordPress blog, it will also be published to your blog’s fan page’s wall automatically. I’m just wondering how to get an email notification when someone posts a comment on your fan page’s wall though (like you normally do if someone posts something onto your wall).
article courtesy of http://www.cravingtech.com/auto-post-wordpress-to-facebook-fan-page.html
You can control which URLs in your press release are clickable and which are not. To include clickable links in your press release body, start them with http://
For example-
| What you enter | What people see | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Visit http://www.prlog.org for details | Visit http://www.prlog.org for details | Activated |
| Visit www.prlog.org for details | Visit www.prlog.org for details | Not Activated |
| Visit <a href=”http://www.prlog.org”> PRLog</a> for details |
Visit PRLog for details | Not Activated |
This will work in the press release body field only. First 3 such URLs in the press release body will be converted to clickable links. The About section is considered part of the body for this purpose. Please note that other press release fields like headline, summary, etc don’t support clickable links.
Also, if you copy and paste from another program, all your clickable links will become plain URLs in the copy-paste process. First 3 URLs starting with http:// will be automatically converted to clickable links when previewing the press release. So, if you can see links in the press release preview, then they’ll show up like that later when the press release is published.
There is no limit on the size of the URLs. Our system can handle both short and long URLs equally well. If you do see an issue, alert us and we’ll fix it.
One final note, for the press release to look professional and not totally promotional, it is recommended to have links in the end of the press release. The software automatically enforces the following rules-
- Links starting before first 200 characters in the press release body are not activated.
- For press release body … (Very easy to meet)
- >2000 characters, 3 links are activated.
- >1500 characters, 2 links are activated.
- >1000 characters, 1 link is activated.
Facebook launched its widely popular application developer program back in May 2007. As of press time, there were more than 14,000 applications. Some, including most of the popular apps, are made by companies, while a few of the popular apps, and a significant number of the long tail of the less popular applications are made by individual developers.
But a new study suggests there may be a bigger problem with the applications. Many are given access to far more personal data than they need to in order to run, including data on users who never even signed up for the application. Not only does Facebook enable this, but it does little to warn users that it is even happening, and of the risk that a rogue application developer can pose.
Privacy problems for the user
In order to install an application, a Facebook user must first agree to “allow this application to…know who I am and access my information.” Users not willing to permit the application access to all kinds of data from their profile cannot install it onto their Facebook page.

What kind of information does Facebook give the application developer access to? Practically everything. According to the Application Terms of Service,
“Facebook may…provide developers access to…your name, your profile picture, your gender, your birthday, your hometown location…your current location…your political view, your activities, your interests…your relationship status, your dating interests, your relationship interests, your summer plans, your Facebook user network affiliations, your education history, your work history,…copies of photos in your Facebook Site photo albums…a list of user IDs mapped to your Facebook friends.”
The applications don’t actually run on Facebook’s servers, but on servers owned and operated by the application developers. Whenever a Facebook user’s profile is displayed, the application servers contact Facebook, request the user’s private data, process it, and send back whatever content will be displayed to the user. As part of its terms of service, Facebook makes the developers promise to throw away any data they received from Facebook after the application content has been sent back for display to the user.
For the entire article, go to: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13739_3-9854409-46.html
HTML5 is still being finalized and although it will be several years before it becomes the standard verion of HTML used across the internet there are plenty of sites starting to use the new markup – an obvious example is YouTube using the <video> tag on some of it’s pages to show video without needing Flash… For the most part we won’t need to worry about HTML5 until IE9 has been released and IE6/7 has disappeared or at least drops to a sufficiently low level to not worry about but it’s worth thinking about now – with the launch of the iPad, HTML5 is getting talked about a lot more.
Some of the main differences between HTML5 and HTML4 is that there are new elements eg. <section> <header> <footer> <article>. Each of these elements are designed to contain certain parts of the web document to allow for easier accessibility – and no doubt the big search engines are already working out how best to read HTML5 sites and use the data to optimize their results.
What is HTML 5?
HTML5 is currently under development as the next major revision of the HTML standard. Like its immediate predecessors, HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.1, HTML5 is a standard for structuring and presenting content on the World Wide Web. The new standard incorporates features like video playback and drag-and-drop that have been previously dependent on third-party browser plug-ins such as Adobe Flash, Microsoft Silverlight, and Google Gears.
What is HTML Video?
HTML5 video is an element introduced in the HTML5 draft specification for the purpose of playing videos or movies[1], partially replacing the object element.
As of May 2010[update], Adobe Flash Player was widely used to embed video on web sites such as YouTube, since the majority of web browsers had Adobe’s Flash Player installed (with controversial exceptions such as the browser on the Apple iPhone and iPad). HTML5 video is intended by its creators to become the new standard way to show video online, but has been hampered by lack of agreement as to which video formats should be supported in the video tag.


